There are two irreconcilable positions on the authenticity of the Shroud: The camp of sindonologists assert the relic’s authenticity, and the other side insists the Shroud is a pious medieval forgery. The angels above display the resulting image. It shows Nicodemus, Joseph of Arimathea, and John the Evangelist wrapping Jesus’s body in a burial cloth. It is telling to see how the historiography of the Shroud during the early modern era and until the turn of the 20th century strove to remove any untoward aspects from its history by suppressing inconvenient documents and creating new legends.ĭeposition of Christ (1620), by Giovanni Battista della Rovere, portrays the imagined origins of the Shroud of Turin. But because such are only available from the Middle Ages onwards, historians often use imagination to fill the large chronological gap between the first and 14th centuries. These accounts recount what can be inferred from historical documents. Although the field is dominated by the so-called hard sciences, some authors have also dealt with the relic’s history. Over the past 120 years, sindonology has produced hundreds of books and articles dedicated to the relic, involving every possible field: chemistry, physics, forensic medicine, palynology, numismatics, and so on. The Shroud was first photographed in 1898, and this year is commonly considered to mark the emergence of sindonology (from the Greek word sindōn, used in the Gospels to define Jesus’s burial cloth), that is, the science-or, rather, set of scientific disciplines-that set out to prove the authenticity of the Shroud. This damage is believed to have occurred due to fire in 1532. Two scorch marks, which appear as black lines, and a series of vaguely triangular holes caused by burns, run lengthwise down the fabric, on either side of the human figure. The human image is the result of a change in the color of the linen fibers, but it remains to be fully understood how such coloration occurred. This figure appears to bear marks from flagellation and crucifixion as well as various red spots corresponding to the blows. 1 It is a linen sheet measuring about 14.5 by 3.5 feet and featuring a monochromatic image on the front and back of a naked male figure. Today many consider the Shroud of Turin-the alleged burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth-to be the most important relic of Christianity. It has been kept in the royal chapel of the Cathedral of Turin.Ĭredit: Photo by Giuseppe Enrie, 1931, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons. The Rosicrucian Order (AMORC), for example, has a more plausible explanation to this whole Jesus of Nazareth thingy - even though it's also not entirely evidence-based, but adequate enough to support the hypothesis that Jesus was indeed a normal person, with cool and altruistic intentions - just like you and me :) However, it is true that Jesus did God's work on Earth in an extraordinary and miraculous way - by working together with his friends and buddies - who may have exaggerated the work of Jesus in their scriptures just a little bit - in their exuberance to manifest Peace on Earth.The Shroud of Turin is a linen sheet long claimed to feature the image of the tortured body of Jesus of Nazareth. So in a sense, Jesus returned indeed from the dead - but not in a literal sense - as falsely depicted by the Vatican and other hard-core religious organizations. Interesting to note, that regardless if the Shroud of Turin is fake or not - recent evidence based information indicates that Jesus actually survived the crucifixion - and was brought down from the cross by his friends and buddies who saved him with their healing arts. Cool doc about the Shroud of Turin - which may have been the burial shroud in which Jesus of Nazareth was wrapped after crucifixion - which continues to be intensely studied, and remains a controversial issue among scientists and biblical scholars.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |